New York Bill Targets Crypto Fraud and Rug Pulls

bitcoin 1 The New York State Assembly is reviewing a proposed bill, A06515, to strengthen legal action against cryptocurrency fraud. Introduced by Assemblymember Clyde Vanel on March 5, the bill seeks to criminalize fraudulent activities, including rug pulls, private key fraud, and failure to disclose financial interests in digital assets.

The New York State Assembly is reviewing a proposed bill, A06515, to strengthen legal action against cryptocurrency fraud. Introduced by Assemblymember Clyde Vanel on March 5, the bill seeks to criminalize fraudulent activities, including rug pulls, private key fraud, and failure to disclose financial interests in digital assets.

This comes just weeks after the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) launched a cyber unit dedicated to tackling fraud in the digital asset space.

Strengthening Crypto Regulations

Bill A06515 acknowledges the potential of blockchain technology while emphasizing the need for regulations that prevent financial crimes. The proposal outlines new offenses specific to digital assets, including illegal rug pulls, private key fraud, and deceptive financial practices involving virtual tokens.

One of the bill’s key points is addressing bundled token rug pulls, a scheme where developers attract investors by bundling assets, only to later withdraw funds and leave investors with worthless tokens.

Additionally, private key fraud, equated to stealing a debit card PIN, is identified as a serious financial crime under the proposed legislation.

Addressing Industry Challenges

The cryptocurrency industry has faced growing concerns over security and fraud, especially after high-profile scams involving multi-billion dollar memecoins such as LIBRA and MELANIA.

While some regulatory bodies have recently dropped lawsuits against companies like Consensys, Uniswap, and Yuga Labs, efforts to hold actual bad actors accountable appear to be intensifying. The introduction of this bill signals a shift in regulatory focus toward targeting clear-cut cases of fraud instead of broader industry crackdown